Readability Test of Entrepreneurship Learning System for Vocational High School Students
Uji Keterbacaan Sistem Pembelajaran Kewirausahaan untuk Siswa Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69693/jiis.v2i1.10Keywords:
Keterbacaan Sistem, Kewirausahaan, SMK, Keterampilan Siswa, Pendidikan VokasiAbstract
Pendidikan kejuruan di Indonesia memiliki mandat strategis untuk menghasilkan lulusan yang tidak hanya siap kerja tetapi juga mampu berwirausaha. Namun, implementasi pendidikan kewirausahaan di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK) masih menghadapi kendala, salah satunya rendahnya keterbacaan sistem pembelajaran yang menghambat pemahaman siswa terhadap materi kewirausahaan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji keterbacaan sistem kewirausahaan di SMK sebagai mendukung keterampilan kewirausahaan siswa. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kuantitatif dengan instrumen kuesioner yang terdiri dari 20 item pernyataan berbasis skala Likert. Responden berjumlah 233 orang yang mencakup siswa SMK, guru, dan pelaku UMKM. Analisis data dilakukan menggunakan rumus indeks persentase untuk mengetahui tingkat keterbacaan sistem, yang kemudian ditafsirkan dalam kategori sangat layak, layak, kurang layak, dan tidak layak. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keterbacaan sistem kewirausahaan berada pada kategori “sangat layak” dalam tiga aspek utama, yaitu kualitas konten, komunikasi visual, dan rekayasa perangkat lunak. Mayoritas responden menilai ketepatan, kejelasan, urutan, serta kesesuaian konten sistem sudah akurat dan mudah dipahami. Aspek komunikasi visual meliputi tipografi, warna, navigasi, desain, serta media audio visual juga dinilai mendukung keterbacaan dan menarik perhatian pengguna. Sementara itu, aspek rekayasa perangkat lunak seperti kualitas penyajian, efektivitas penggunaan, keandalan, kejelasan petunjuk, usability, dan accessibility menunjukkan tingkat kelayakan tinggi. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa sistem kewirausahaan yang terbaca dengan baik dapat memperkuat keterampilan siswa dalam memahami konsep kewirausahaan dan mendukung kesiapan mereka sebagai wirausaha muda.
References
Agbarakwe, H. A., & Ossai-Chidi, A. G. (2025). Effect of Mayer’s modality principle of multimedia design on secondary school students’ performance in Biology. FNAS Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 6(2), 49–56.
Aprilia, S., & Jannah, R. (2025). Strategi branding digital untuk siswa SMK. Indonesia Business Journal.
Azzam, A., & Adha, M. A. (2025). Ekspektasi pendapatan dan praktik bisnis terhadap minat siswa. Nian Tana Sikka.
Ackermans, K., et al. (2025). Instructional videos and deeper processing: Insights and lessons. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence.
Ayres, P. (2025). Some do’s and don’ts of educational videos. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence.
Berigel, M., et al. (2025). Accessibility analysis of educational websites using WCAG 2.0. ACM Digital Library.
Brame, C. J. (2016). Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4), es6.
Berney, S., & Bétrancourt, M. (2016). Does animation enhance learning? A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 101, 150–167.
Bigelow, C. (2019). Typeface features and legibility research. Vision Research, 165, 162–172.
Brame, C. J. (2016). Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4), es6.
Bringhurst, R. (2012). The elements of typographic style (4th ed.). Hartley & Marks. (Karya asli diterbitkan 1992).
Candido, V., et al. (2025). Applying multimedia-learning principles to AR: Effects on cognitive load and learning outcomes. Computers & Education: AI.
Cetinkaya, N. E., & Krämer, N. (2025). Building trust in workplace information systems: The role of reliability and design. Behaviour & Information Technology.
Cetinkaya, N. E., & Krämer, N. (2025). Between transparency and trust: Identifying key factors in AI system perception. Behaviour & Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2025.2533358
Dale, E. (1969). Audio-Visual Methods in Teaching. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
De la Mora Velasco, E. (2025). Integrating background music into instructional videos. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 9.
De la Mora Velasco, E., & Hirumi, A. (2023). The impact of background music on learners: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychology of Music, 51(8), 1972–1995.
Du Preez, I., et al. (2025). Pedagogical and visual design principles for educational quiz-games. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2523390
Diemand-Yauman, C., Oppenheimer, D. M., & Vaughan, E. B. (2011). Fortune favors the bold (and the italicized): Effects of disfluency on educational outcomes. Cognition, 118(1), 111–115.
Ernawati, T., & Sugianto, C. A. (2025). Poster digital sebagai media pengembangan usaha siswa. Puan Indonesia.
Fink, M. C., et al. (2023). What variables are connected with system usability and satisfaction? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 173, 103097.
Furukawa, E., et al. (2025). Protocol for a systematic review of PEMAT studies. JMIR Research Protocols, 14, e63489.
Figl, K., et al. (2025). The positive effect of webpage prototypicality on users’ attitudes. Electronic Markets. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-025-00777-9
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications. Pearson Higher Ed.
Gouravajhala, R., & McDaniel, M. A. (2025). Learning from educational texts: Is reduction in global text cohesion a desirable difficulty as structure building skill increases? Learning and Individual Differences, 121, 102720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102720
Gritz, W., et al. (2025). From formulas to figures: How visual complexity impacts interactions in educational videos. arXiv preprint.
Mayer, R. E. (2020). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Hilmi, M. A., Ekohariadi, E., & Rijanti, T. (2025). Empowering students’ entrepreneurial readiness through field practice. IJOERAR.
Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 722–738.
Insani, A., Hamdani, N. A., & Herlianti, A. O. (2025). E-learning dan employability skills siswa SMK. APSKI.
ISO. (2018). ISO 9241-11: Ergonomics of human-system interaction—Usability: Definitions and concepts. ISO.
Kemendikbud. (2021). Kurikulum 2013 SMK: Implementasi Mata Pelajaran Produk Kreatif dan Kewirausahaan. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Kemendikbud. (2024). Kecakapan Berwirausaha Tingkatkan Kebekerjaan Lulusan SMK. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2024/11/kecakapan-berwirausaha-tingkatkan-kebekerjaan-lulusan-smk
Legge, G. E., & Bigelow, C. (2011). Does print size matter for reading? Journal of Vision, 11(5), 8. https://doi.org/10.1167/11.5.8
Li, J., et al. (2025). Modeling student satisfaction in online learning using random forest. Scientific Reports, 15, 6686. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-06686-3
Li, Z., et al. (2025). Visual comfort models based on coloured text and neutral backgrounds. Vision Research, 224, 108739.
Lomellini, A. (2025). Accessible and inclusive online learning in higher education: A review. TechTrends.
Maqbool, B., et al. (2024). Potential effectiveness and efficiency issues in usability engineering. Journal of Systems and Software, 207, 111706.
Maydiantoro, A. (2023). Development of virtual reality technology in entrepreneurship education in vocational schools. WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education, 20(5), 55–64.
Nielsen, J. (1994/updated). 10 usability heuristics for user-interface design. Nielsen Norman Group.
NN/g. (2020). Help & documentation (Usability Heuristic #10). Nielsen Norman Group.
Noviana, E. (2023). The comparison analysis of teacher’s learning effectiveness in realizing entrepreneurial skills among SMA, SMK, and MA students. International Journal of Instruction, 16(2), 682–700. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16237a
Nurseto, T. (2011). Membuat media pembelajaran yang menarik. Jurnal Ekonomi & Pendidikan, 8(1), 19–35.
Olawale, B. E., Omodan, B. I., & Saddiq, K. (2025). Enablers and barriers of e-learning: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1526076.
Oudbier, S. J., et al. (2025). Patients’ experienced usability and satisfaction with digital health systems. JMIR Medical Informatics, 13, e63703. medinform.jmir.org
Pertiwi, N. K. D., & Marlena, N. (2025). Pengaruh pendidikan kewirausahaan terhadap minat berwirausaha pada siswa SMK. JPTN.
Pirolli, P., & Card, S. (2000). Using information scent to model user needs/actions on the Web. CHI ‘00 Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/365024.365325
Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. (2025). Paper on hybrid UIs to enhance text readability in AR. ACM Digital Library.
Ramos, C. L., et al. (2019). Assessing the understandability/actionability of online materials with PEMAT. World Neurosurgery, 130, e660–e666.
Rafli, M., Indreswari, H., Bariyyah, K., Hambali, I. M., & Muslihati. (2025). Validity and reliability of an Indonesian entrepreneurial intention instrument for vocational students. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Studies, 5(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.31098/ijeass.v5i1.3335
Rello, L., & Baeza-Yates, R. (2016). The effect of font type on screen readability by people with dyslexia. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 8(4), 1–33.
Resmi, S., Widhar Pahlevi, R., Kusumawati, I., & Prasetyo, D. (2024). Study of enhancement of student entrepreneurship competence through digital learning models. Journal of Electrical Systems, 20(5s), 970–981.
Riduwan. (2012). Metode dan Teknik Menyusun Tesis. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Rochayati, U., & Hartopo, I. (2025). Teaching Factory: Enhancing vocational soft skills. IJED.
Rodríguez-Ascaso, A., et al. (2024). Performance of students with different accessibility needs in accessible MOOCs. PLOS ONE, 19(12), e0299090.
Setyawan, A. B. (2025). Impact of PKWU and creativity on entrepreneurial interest. CHSS.
Sauer, J., & Sonderegger, A. (2022). Visual aesthetics and user experience: A multiple-session experiment. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 168, 102905.
Sawyer, B., et al. (2025). Font size, x-height, and readability: How typography affects reading speed across sizes. Journal of Vision, 25(9).
Shneiderman, B. (n.d.). The Eight Golden Rules of interface design. University of Maryland.
Shoemaker, S. J., Wolf, M. S., & Brach, C. (2014). The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). Patient Education and Counseling, 96(3), 395–403.
Shrestha, S., Shan, Y., Emerson, R., & Hosseini, Z. (2025). Developing and usability testing of an AR tool for online engineering education. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 18, 13–24.
Stamatakis, M., et al. (2025). Using vision-language models to generate questions for educational videos. arXiv preprint.
Sung, E., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). Affective impact of navigational and signaling aids in e-learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1812–1821.
Shrestha, S., Shan, Y., Emerson, R., & Hosseini, Z. (2025). Developing and usability testing of an augmented reality tool for online engineering education. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 18, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2024.3520413
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suparno, S., & Fidhyallah, N. F. (2025). Navigating the entrepreneurial knowledge and competence among vocational students. EduLearn.
Suryatama, H. (2024). Unlocking potential with entrepreneurship training for vocational students: A case study in Mlati, Sleman. Journal of Social and Community Development.
TRU EDDL. (2025). Weeks 8–9: Audio—recommendations for narration vs. music. Thompson Rivers University.
Tractinsky, N., Katz, A. S., & Ikar, D. (2000). What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers, 13(2), 127–145.
Wang, Y., et al. (2025). The effect of color contrast on visual clarity of complex images. Buildings, 15(7), 1157.
WebAIM. (2025). The WebAIM Million—Accessibility of the top 1,000,000 home pages.
WebAIM. (2025). Contrast Checker. https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/ webaim.org
Wulandari, N. (2020). Sistem pembelajaran kewirausahaan di SMK: Integrasi kurikulum dan praktik industri. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 10(3), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v10i3.33321
Wang, F., Yin, H., & King, R. B. (2025). Profiling motivation and engagement in online learning: A multilevel latent profile analysis of students and institutions. Computers & Education, 227, 105209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105209
Wang, F., Yin, H., & King, R. B. (2025). Profiling motivation and engagement in online learning: A multilevel latent profile analysis. Computers & Education, 227, 105209.
WebAIM. (2025). The WebAIM Million: 2025 report. WebAIM. webaim.org
W3C. (2023–2024). WCAG 2.2 Recommendation and overview. W3C. W3C+1
Will, J., Gupta, M., Zaretsky, J., Dowlath, A., Testa, P., & Feldman, J. (2025). Enhancing the readability of online patient education materials using LLMs. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, e69955.
Will, J., Gupta, M., Zaretsky, J., Dowlath, A., Testa, P., & Feldman, J. (2025). Enhancing the readability of online patient education materials using large language models: Cross-sectional study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, e69955. https://doi.org/10.2196/69955
Wuandari, A., & Lestari, A. A. (2025). Vocational expansion and graduate quality. UMP Proceedings.
Ye, L., et al. (2025). The impact of aesthetic education on university students’ psychological well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1515671.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
